SU actually watched a good part of last night’s Knick games. Truth be told, the TV was on during that time but I slept through a good portion of the 1st half. I mean it’s not that compelling. But in the first 5 minutes of the 3rd quarter, the ball was moving all over the place, Melo was actually driving and dishing (repeat: Melo was actually driving and dishing) and they had 8 assists in 5 minutes! The lead ballooned to 15 points and they were in control until early in the 4th quarter.
Then, the offense switched back to isolation play. And for the final 4 minutes, it stuck in Melo’s hands. Even Clyde Frazier took time out from his “swishing and dishing” nonsense to comment on how the ball was no longer moving. It was back to isolation offense similar to what we have seen for the past 5 years since Anthony was traded to the Knicks. SU kept looking for Mike Woodson – surely he must have left the LA Clippers bench for a game and wanted to see his isolation offense in all its glory again in NY. The Knicks hung on in the last couple of minutes as Calderon made a couple of plays with and without the ball.
SU asks these questions:
- Did Melo decide to no longer share the ball on his own?
- Did Derek Fisher decide to revert to an isolation type offense?
- Do questions 1 and 2 even matter?
While it’s a players’ league, you need the coach to have his players carry out what he wants. Either Fisher can’t control Anthony in those situations or he is exercising poor judgment and moving away from what got him the lead. Either way, it’s wrong.
SU is a simple guy and asks this question: Aren’t there analytics that show offensive efficiency when the ball moves on offense vs. isolation style of play? Isn’t this a no-brainer? I know isolation play makes coaching offense so much easier but it cannot be the most productive and efficient style of play. In a world of data analytics, what is the answer?