I must admit that I do not get caught up in the Baseball Hall of Fame voting. It’s good material for sports talk radio debates (or in the case of Mike Francesa sports talk radio monologues) but the whole voting process is a little inexact and there has always been a considerable amount of judgment applied in the individual voting. Griffey was a no-brainer – one of the top players in his era and would have likely shattered all the records if his body had held up. The perception is that he was “clean” along the lines of Derek Jeter.
Mike Piazza was the top offensive catcher and statistically, you can’t argue whether he belongs. There have always been whispers about PED use with him – see “backne” issues and his elusive and vague answers about whether he ever used them. I mean hitting 450-foot homeruns to the opposite field flat-footed with no stride is unusual. But as is the case with most of these guys, there is no smoking gun.
It does seem like players such as Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens are starting to pick up more votes now from the baseball writers. Again, there are no clear guidelines on whether suspected PED users should get in or not. Neither of them failed a drug test and while there are lots of stories out there, nothing has officially “stuck.” From SU’s standpoint, I would keep them out but I believe over time, we will start to see these players admitted to the HOF.
SU believes that Derek Jeter can now play a valuable role here through his Players’ Tribune web site. Let the players sign on to a letter of admission on the Players’ Tribune site, in their own words, and as a group confess to what they did. Once and for all, case closed. Pick a date when it’s published and get them all to sign.
A question for the intergalactic SU fan base: If Bonds and Clemens eventually get in, will we ever see A-Rod in there? His numbers are as good or better than anyone’s for his position. He was certainly much clumsier about his cheating. From my perspective, in terms of who did what, he falls in the same category as Bonds and Clemens and for that matter, David Ortiz. No clear factual evidence but lots of circumstantial evidence. The question becomes where do you draw the line?