First of all, a happy and healthy new year to all of the Jewish subscribers in SU’s intergalactic subscriber base. Many are clamoring for SU to comment on the Serena Williams outburst from Saturday evening. Full disclosure: SU was watching but lost the cable TV signal for the key moments and has had to piece together what happened. But I think I get the gist of it. SU’s thoughts:
- Serena is the GOAT in women’s tennis. No question. Her dominance for so many years is incredible.
- SU has never been a fan of hers. From the beginning. I found her to be arrogant, self-absorbed; it’s always all about her. Until recently, she rarely gave credit to her opponent in losses. It’s always been about the way she played that day. I also accept that this attitude on the court has helped her become the champion she is.
- Serena has always felt that she was singled out and unfairly persecuted. This year in particular, she has commented several times that she is drug tested much more than any other player.
- The umpire that did her match has historically been tough on the men’s stars as well in their matches – especially Nadal. He is a stickler for the rules.
For me, Serena made the mistake of continuing to push and push and push in her comments with the umpire. She is correct that the men players will often complain to the umpire and make snide remarks in the heat of battle. SU has seen this but they have their say and move on. Most umpires allow the outburst, the blowing off of steam and then the match continues. Is there coaching in tennis? Apparently so. But Serena’s coach from what I saw was pretty open and obvious about it. For her to say that she never looks over is not believable. And she made the leap from coaching to “cheating.” I don’t think the tennis fan automatically equates coaching with cheating. At this level, SU doesn’t think whatever advice is coming from the friends’ box is not all that impactful. She didn’t let it go. From what I heard, she was abusive multiple times there during each changeover.
I also felt the quick move to make this about women’s rights seems to me to be more of convenience than her original intent. As SU said earlier, it’s always about her and I think that was the whole motivation here. She is a champion of women’s rights for sure but that wasn’t the initial goal. She is the same player who once threatened to stuff a tennis ball down the throat of a lines woman at the US Open in the Finals. There have been other occasions as she is very competitive.
The umpire could have given her a warning in his discussion with her and maybe he should have done that. SU thinks back in the NBA to the time that Amar’e Stoudamire, when he was on the Suns, took one step on the court when a fight broke out in the playoffs against San Antonio. The NBA suspended him for the next game and the Suns lost that series to the Spurs. Turned it all around but that was the rule. Serena’s point here is that men get away with much more. SU’s observation is that the men will make the remarks and move on. She, like a manager in baseball that is looking to get ejected, kept going and going and going. To SU, she earned what she got for that behavior and in the end, didn’t give the umpire a way out.
SU hated the way she took the spotlight off of Osaka who was thoroughly outplaying her. Serena ruined the moment for her – that was wrong. I know she tried to make things right in the trophy award ceremony but too late.
OK, what do you think? Was Serena wronged? Was she jobbed there?